Home/Work/An automation technology company
Case 03 · Technology

The technology was too specialized,
and neither the market nor the public could follow it

An automation company with genuinely strong technology described itself entirely in jargon. Trade editors were willing to publish, but readers could not follow the result. Financial editors wanted the story and could not find an angle in.

01The challenge

The technology was genuinely strong. The problem: there was no benchmark. Tell a customer "precision to 0.02 mm" and they cannot tell whether that is good. Tell an investor "yield up three points" and they do not know what that means in this industry.

Jargon is not the fault. What was missing was translation.

02What we did

We translated the technology into an industry story — trade media first, financial media second.

  1. Find the benchmarks Parameters converted into what a customer feels: hours of downtime avoided, parts not scrapped, headcount not added.
  2. Trade media first Three technical explainers in manufacturing and automation outlets, to earn credibility inside the industry.
  3. Then financial media With that backing, the financial press could be told why this company keeps its edge.

03Results

  • Industry accounts reposted all three technical pieces, unprompted.
  • Financial coverage shifted from "a technology company" to "the hidden champion".
  • Candidates started mentioning the coverage in interviews.

Other cases

See all cases →